質問編集履歴
3
正確にn4659から文章を引用した
test
CHANGED
|
File without changes
|
test
CHANGED
|
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
|
|
|
10
10
|
|
|
11
11
|
|
|
12
12
|
|
|
13
|
-
> in a return statement in a function with a class return type, when the expression is the name of a non-volatile automatic object (other than a function parameter or a variable introduced by the exception-declaration of a handler (
|
|
13
|
+
> in a return statement in a function with a class return type, when the expression is the name of a non-volatile automatic object (other than a function parameter or a variable introduced by the exception-declaration of a handler (18.3)) with the same type (ignoring cv-qualification) as the function return type, the copy/move operation can be omitted by constructing the automatic object directly into the function call’s return object
|
|
14
14
|
|
|
15
15
|
|
|
16
16
|
|
2
リンクの改善
test
CHANGED
|
File without changes
|
test
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
C++17で追加された機能、[値のコピー省略を保証](https://cppref
|
|
1
|
+
C++17で追加された機能、[値のコピー省略を保証](https://ja.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/copy_elision)について、規格のどこにこの記述があるのかわかる方がいましたら、ご教授お願いいたします。
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
3
|
|
|
4
4
|
|
1
書式の改善
test
CHANGED
|
File without changes
|
test
CHANGED
|
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
|
|
|
6
6
|
|
|
7
7
|
|
|
8
8
|
|
|
9
|
-
また、n4659 [class.copy.elision]も関係しそうだと思います。[class.copy.elision]/1.1 の
|
|
9
|
+
また、n4659 [class.copy.elision]も関係しそうだと思います。[class.copy.elision]/1.1 に、次の記述があります。
|
|
10
10
|
|
|
11
11
|
|
|
12
12
|
|